As reported, prior to use during a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the superficial femoral artery, a flexor ansel guiding sheath's dilator was found to be fractured and partially separated upon removal from the package.The device, which was stored in a medical device storage room, was not manipulated or formed by the user.The complaint device did not make patient contact.Another device of the same type was opened and used to complete the procedure.There has been no report that the patient experienced any adverse effects due to this event.
|
Description of event: as reported, prior to use during a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the superficial femoral artery, a flexor ansel guiding sheath's dilator was found to be fractured and partially separated upon removal from the package.The device, which was stored in a medical device storage room, was not manipulated or formed by the user.The complaint device did not make patient contact.Another device of the same type was opened and used to complete the procedure.Investigation ¿ evaluation a visual inspection of the returned device was conducted.A document based investigation was also performed including a review of complaint history, device history record, documentation, drawings, the instructions for use, manufacturing instructions, quality control data, and specifications.The complainant returned one 6fr kcfw received with the 0.038" dilator inserted in a prepped condition.The dilator tip was fractured approx 9mm from the distal tip where the taper begins.The tip was not completely separated.A review of complaint history records shows no other complaints associated with the complaint device lot.A review of the device history record found no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode.Because there are no related non-conformances, adequate inspection activities have been established, there is objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no other lot related complaints that have been received from the field, it was concluded that there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in field.The instructions for use (ifu), provides the following information to the user related to the reported failure mode: warnings "if resistance is encountered during advancement of flexor sheath, assess cause of resistance and consider dilation of any restriction identified or consider alternate treatment strategy." precautions "do not attempt to heat or reshape the device." how supplied "upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred.' a review of relevant manufacturing documents was conducted.It was concluded that the device aspect in question was visually/functionally inspected by quality control and no related gaps in production or processing controls were noted.Based on the provided evidence and the completed investigation, cook has concluded component failure contributed to this incident.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is warranted.Cook will continue to monitor this device via the complaints database for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|