|
A review of the manufacturing documentation associated with lot 82150752 presented no issues during the manufacturing process that can be related to the reported event.This device is available for analysis, but the engineering report is not yet available.However, it will be submitted within 30 days upon receipt.
|
|
As reported, the balloon of a 4mm x 10cm 135 powerflex pro percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta) balloon catheter ruptured at its nominal pressure of 10 atmospheres (atm), during it's second inflation.Another powerflex pro was used to complete the procedure.There was no reported patient injury.The device was stored and handled as per the instruction for use (ifu).There was no difficulty removing the product from the hoop, protective balloon cover, stylet or any of the sterile packaging components.There were no kinks or other damages noted prior to inserting the product the product into the patient.The device prepped normally.A non cordis indeflator was used with 50/50 contrast to saline ratio.The same indeflator was used successfully with other devices.There was no resistance/friction while inserting the balloon through the rotating hemostatic valve nor while inserting the balloon through the guide catheter.No unusual force was used at any time during the procedure.Additional procedural details were requested but are unknown.The device will not be returned for evaluation.
|
|
As reported, the balloon of a 4mm x 10cm 135 powerflex pro percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta) balloon catheter ruptured at its nominal pressure of 10 atmospheres (atm), during its second inflation.Another powerflex pro was used to complete the procedure.There was no reported patient injury.The device was stored and handled as per the instruction for use (ifu).There was no difficulty removing the product from the hoop, protective balloon cover, stylet, or any of the sterile packaging components.There were no kinks or other damages noted prior to inserting the product into the patient.The device prepped normally.A non-cordis insufflator was used with 50/50 contrast to saline ratio.The same insufflator was used successfully with other devices.There was no resistance/friction while inserting the balloon through the rotating hemostatic valve nor while inserting the balloon through the guide catheter.No unusual force was used at any time during the procedure.Additional procedural details were requested but are unknown.The product was returned for analysis.A non-sterile powerflex pro 4mm x 10cm 135 was received for analysis coiled inside a plastic bag.Per visual analysis, the balloon appears to have been previously inflated.Blood residues were observed inside the balloon.No other anomalies were observed.Per functional analysis, balloon inflation was performed.A lab inflator/deflator device was attached to the inflation lumen of unit and pressure applied.A leakage of water was observed coming from the distal area of the balloon.Per sem analysis on the balloon leakage observed during the functional test, results showed that the balloon leakage was caused by a rupture on the balloon surface.The inner surface presented no anomalies near the balloon rupture.The outer surface presented evidence of scratch marks near the balloon rupture.This type of damage is commonly caused during the interaction of the balloon material with a sharp object or mechanical damage.It is very likely that the same factors that caused the observed scratch marks on the balloon outer surface probably led to the rupture condition found on the received device.It seems the balloon material near the rupture was torn either due to the interaction of the balloon with calcified spicules located on the lesion or with a sharp object from the outside of the balloon.No other anomalies were observed during the sem analysis.A product history record (phr) review of lot 82150752 revealed no anomalies or non-conformances during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be associated with the reported event.The reported ¿balloon burst - at/below rbp¿ was confirmed during device analysis as a scratch marks were observed near the balloon rupture.The exact cause could not be determined.Functional analysis revealed a leakage on the balloon outer surface, it appears the balloon material near the rupture was torn with a sharp object from the outside of the balloon, likely calcified spicules located on the lesion.Based on the information available, it is difficult to draw a clinical conclusion between the device and the event reported.However, it is likely vessel characteristics and procedural factors led to the events reported by the customer as evidenced by device analysis.According to the safety information in the instructions for use, ¿if resistance is met during manipulation, determine the cause of the resistance before proceeding.Balloon pressure should not exceed the rated burst pressure.The rated burst pressure is based on the results of in vitro testing.At least 99.9% of the balloons (with a 95% confidence), will not burst at or below their rated burst pressure.Use of a pressure monitoring device is recommended to prevent over pressurization.Use only the recommended balloon inflation medium.Never use air or any gaseous medium to inflate the balloon.Prior to angioplasty, the catheter should be examined to verify functionality and ensure that its size and shape are suitable for the specific procedure for which it is to be used.¿ neither the phr nor the information available suggests a design or manufacturing related cause for the reported event.Therefore, no corrective or preventive action will be taken at this time.
|