|
According to the reporter, during procedure, the thirty three weeks premature baby had a burn to the right foot, both at the top and the bottom of the foot.It was indicated that the nurse changed the sensor's location after eight hours of continuous use to inspect the skin as per hospital protocol.There was patient injury.
|
|
Evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was available for evaluation.Visual inspection found the detector was peeled open exposing the actual detector.Functional testing noted that the sensor was recognized by the patient monitoring system (pms) and emitted a visible light.All sensor parameters were within tolerance.The sensor was found to function normally and within specifications.It was reported that the patient's skin had an issue with the product that was placed in that area.The reported issue could not be confirmed.The most likely cause could not be established from the information available.The evaluation detected an unreported condition: there was a torn component.The product analysis noted evidence that the device was not used as intended.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.The instructions included with this device provide the following guidance: if the sensor is misapplied with excessive pressure for prolonged periods, a pressure injury can occur.Do not use damaged sensor or pulse oximetry cable.Do not use a sensor with exposed optical components.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|