|
As reported, during a procedure involving treatment of a severely calcified, stenosed lesion in the right common femoral artery, an advance 35 lp low profile balloon catheter ruptured.Another manufacturer's 6 french sheath was advanced from the left common femoral artery and a contralateral approach was used to access the right common femoral artery.The complaint device was advanced through the lesion and was inflated with an unknown inflation device to an unknown pressure.Because rupture was suspected based upon fluoroscopy, the complaint device was removed by itself.A longitudinal rupture was noted.Another manufacturer's balloon was then used to complete the procedure and the patient recovered.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.Description of event: as reported, during a procedure involving treatment of a severely calcified, stenosed lesion in the right common femoral artery, an advance 35 lp low profile balloon catheter ruptured.Another manufacturer's 6 french sheath was advanced from the left common femoral artery and a contralateral approach was used to access the right common femoral artery.The complaint device was advanced through the lesion and was inflated with an unknown inflation device to an unknown pressure.Because rupture was suspected based upon fluoroscopy, the complaint device was removed by itself.A longitudinal rupture was noted.Another manufacturer's balloon was then used to complete the procedure and the patient recovered.Investigation ¿ evaluation: a document based investigation was performed including a review of complaint history, device history record, drawings, the instructions for use, manufacturing instructions, quality control data, and specifications.The complaint device was not returned; therefore, no physical examinations could be performed.However, a document based investigation evaluation was performed.There is no evidence to suggest the product was made out of specification.A review of the device history record found no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode.Because there are no related non-conformances, adequate inspection activities have been established, there is objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no other lot related complaints that have been received from the field, it was concluded that there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in field.A review of complaint history records shows no other complaints associated with the complaint device lot.The instructions for use (ifu), provides the following information to the user related to the reported failure mode: device description ¿the balloon is manufactured from an extra-thinwall, high-strength, minimally compliant material.Particular care should be taken in handling the balloon to prevent damage.It will inflate to the indicated size parameters when utilizing proper pressure recommendations.Adhere to balloon inflation pressure parameters indicated in the compliance card insert.Refer to label for further information.Use of a pressure gauge is recommended to monitor inflation pressures.¿ intended use ¿the advance 35lp low profile pta balloon dilatation catheter is indicated for percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta) of lesions peripheral arteries including iliac, renal, popliteal, infrapopliteal, femoral, and iliofemoral as well as obstructive lesions of native or synthetic arteriovenous dialysis fistulae.¿ warnings: ¿do not exceed rated burst pressure.Rupture of balloon may occur.Adhere to balloon inflation pressure parameters in the compliance card insert.Over-inflation may cause rupture of the balloon, which resultant damage to the vessel wall.Use of a pressure gauge is recommended to monitor inflation pressures.¿ ¿do not use a power injector for balloon inflation or injection of contrast medium through catheter lumen marked ¿distal¿.Rupture may occur.¿ instructions for use.Balloon preparation.¿choose a balloon appropriate to lesion length and vessel diameter.¿ ¿upon removal from package, inspect the catheter to ensure no damage has occurred during shipping.¿ balloon introduction and inflation.¿note: if resistance is met while advancing the balloon dilatation catheter, determine the cause and proceed with caution.¿ ¿inflate balloon to desired pressure.Adhere to recommended balloon inflation pressures.(see compliance card insert.)¿ ¿if balloon pressure is lost and/or balloon rupture occurs, deflate balloon and remove balloon and sheath as a unit.¿ how supplied.¿store in a dark, dry, cool place.Avoid extended exposure to light.Upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred.¿ capa pr203645 was previously completed to address the increasing trend of balloon rupture for pta4 and pta5 devices.The capa identified the following root causes: inadequate preventive maintenance (pm) of folding equipment, inadequate process controls for folding and bonding processes, and inadequate qc work instructions for inspection microtears.The following corrective actions were taken to address the identified root causes.Preventive maintenance requirements for msi folding equipment were updated and added to maintenance connection.Additionally, process controls requirements were changed in order to include improved conditions for inspections (higher magnification, higher inflation pressure) and additional pictures of microtears were added to qc work instructions.The complaint device was manufactured prior to the conclusion of capa implementation actions.However, based on the information provided in the complaint file, review of the device history record, and without the device return it is unknown and cannot be confirmed if the root causes identified in the capa are related to this incident.Cook has concluded that the patient¿s anatomy most likely contributed to this incident.As reported, the user noted that the rupture was potentially caused by the severely calcified lesion.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is warranted.Cook will continue to monitor this device via the complaints database for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|