|
Catalog Number UNKFILTER |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Perforation (2001); Stenosis (2263); Thromboembolism (2654); Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165); Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440)
|
Event Date 12/22/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Occupation: other, senior counsel, litigation.Please note that the exact event date is unknown and the event date is the complaint awareness date.As reported, the patient underwent placement of an unspecified cordis inferior vena cava (ivc) filter.The indication for filter placement is not available.The report states that the filter subsequently malfunctioned including perforation, device embedded and unable to be retrieved, caval thrombosis, thrombosis/embolism, post-thrombotic syndrome, stenosis, lifetime anticoagulation, leg swelling and pain post implant.The filter remains implanted; thus, unavailable for analysis.The product was not returned for analysis and the sterile lot number has not been provided; therefore, no device analysis nor device history record review could be performed.The cordis vena cava filters are indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via percutaneous placement in the vena cava for patients in which anticoagulants are contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease has failed, emergency treatment following massive pulmonary embolism where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced or for chronic, recurrent pulmonary embolism where anticoagulant therapy has failed, or is contraindicated.The purpose of a vena cava filter is to catch thrombus from the lower extremities as it travels along normal blood flow patterns up towards the heart.The predominant concern for embedding with in the wall of the ivc is the development of endothelialization.Endothelialization is the healing of the inner surfaces of vessels or grafts by endothelial cells.This is the normal process whereby the body heals and recovers from invasive procedures.Endothelialization has been shown to occur in as short a period as 12 days.Blood clots, post thrombotic syndrome and occlusive thrombosis within the filter and vasculature do not represent a device malfunction.It was reported that there was perforation of the ivc; however, a clinical conclusion could not be determined as to the cause of the event.A review of the instructions for use notes vessel damage such as intimal tears and perforation as procedural complications related it ivc filters.Ivc perforation from removable filters is relatively common, and directly related to how long the filter has been in place.Studies have noted a greater than 80% perforation rate overall, with all filters imaged after 71 days from implantation revealing some level of perforation.Stenosis of the ivc is associated with all ivc filter products and does not represent a device malfunction.A protective inferior vena cava (ivc) filter may later be incorporated into a chronic post-thrombotic ilio-caval obstruction (occlusive, requiring recanalization, or nonocclusive).Obstruction of varying types of ivc filters may occur due to primary thrombosis of the filter or capture of large emboli.Permanent ivc filters have been reported to obstruct in up to 20% of patients.Anxiety and pain do not represent a device malfunction and may be related to underlying patient related issues.Clinical factors that may have influenced the event include patient, pharmacological and lesion characteristics.Without procedural films or images for review the reported event(s) could not be confirmed.Given the limited information available for review at this time, there is nothing to suggest that the reported events are related to the design and manufacturing process of the device; therefore, no corrective action will be taken.Should additional information become available, the file will be updated accordingly.(b)(4).Please note that this is the initial/final report for this product.
|
|
Event Description
|
As reported by the legal brief, the patient underwent placement of an unspecified cordis vena cava filter.The report states that the filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused injury and damage to the patient including, but not limited to perforation, device embedded and unable to be retrieved, caval thrombosis, thrombosis/embolism, post-thrombotic syndrome, stenosis, lifetime anticoagulation, leg swelling and pain post implant.As a direct and proximate result of these malfunctions, the patient suffered life-threatening injuries and damages, and required extensive medical care and treatment.As a further proximate result, the patient has suffered and will continue to suffer significant medical expenses, pain and suffering, and other damages.The form states that the device was unable to retrieved; however, there was no documentation provided of any attempt to remove the device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|