Udi: (b)(4).Per the instructions for use (ifu), valve malposition requiring intervention is a known potential complication associated with the transcatheter aortic valve replacement (tavr) procedure.There are multiple patient and procedural factors that alone or in combination can cause or contribute to ventricular malposition, including improper positioning prior to deployment, poor image intensifier angle, poor coaxial alignment of the valve/delivery system, a narrow, calcified sinotubular junction (stj), minimally or bulky/severely calcified aortic leaflets, rapid deployment, release of stored tension during deployment, and movement of the delivery system by the operator.Additionally, per the instructions for use (ifu), paravalvular leak (pvl) is a potential adverse event associated with bioprosthetic heart valves and the transcatheter aortic valve replacement (tavr) procedure.The patient screening manual and the procedure didactic identify several procedural and anatomical factors which could contribute to pvl, including device malposition, inaccurate measurement of the native valve annulus, uneven distribution of calcium on the native valve, bulky or severe calcification, an elliptical annulus shape and valve under-sizing.Physicians are extensively trained by edwards before they are qualified to use the sapien thv.The patient screening manual instructs the operator on proper aortic valve and root assessment, including the use of echo, aortogram and ct to appropriately measure the annulus diameter, content and distribution of calcium, and leaflet characteristics.Contraindications, important considerations when assessing the valve, and choosing the proper thv are also discussed.The thv training manuals instruct the operator on proper positioning and deployment of the valve, including all procedural and anatomical considerations.Physicians are extensively trained by edwards before they are qualified to use the sapien thv.Training includes patient screening, device preparation, approach, deployment, imaging, procedure-specific training manuals and proctored procedures.The correct alignment and positioning of the device at the point of deployment is emphasized as a key factor to the placement and fixation of the device.Operators are also instructed to use fluoroscopy as the primary method of visualization for positioning and deployment.In patients with high-risk anatomical features for ventricular malposition (i.E.Small, calcified stj, minimal leaflet calcification), bav may provide indication of potential balloon movement during valve deployment.Per the instructions for use (ifu) cardiovascular injury, such as perforation dissection of vessels, ventricle, myocardium or valvular structures, is a known potential complication associated with the tavr procedure.According to the thv training manuals, risk factors for aortic dissection, hematoma or annular rupture during the tavr procedure include significant thv over sizing, severely obliterated sinuses of valsalva, porcelain aorta and/or presence of bulky calcification and narrow calcified stj.In addition, advanced age, female gender, small body weight, and steroid dependency can also be contributing factors.The sapien valve relies on native valve calcium to securely anchor to the annulus.Despite this beneficial aspect of calcium, bulky calcium can increase the risk of calcific nodule displacement into the vasculature, which can lead to vascular injury.At times the extent and distribution of calcium can impair ease of delivery of the valve, correct positioning of the valve, deployment of the valve and procedural success.In this case, there was no allegation or indication a device malfunction contributed to these adverse events.The exact cause of the events is unknown but may have occurred as a result of patient (sievers 1 bicuspid valve), and/or procedural factors device manipulation).The ifu and training manuals have been reviewed and no inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.No corrective or preventative actions are required.
|