|
H10: manufacturing review: a lot history review, a device history record review and complete manufacturing review could not be conducted for the investigation as the lot number is unknown.Investigation summary: one hard base port attached to a catheter was returned for evaluation.Visual, microscopic visual and functional evaluation were returned for evaluation.A circumferential break was noted on the catheter just distal to the cath-lock.Striations were noted on the circumferential break surface.Further during functional evaluation, the port body with attached catheter segment was patent to infusion and aspiration without issue.However, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported fluid leak issue as the exact circumstances at the time of the reported event are unknown and the clinical conditions alleged in the complaint cannot be confirmed.A definitive root cause could not be determined.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: g3.H11: h6 (method, result and conclusion).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : see h10.
|