|
|
| Catalog Number |
0010211 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Material Deformation (2976); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Adhesion(s) (1695); Purulent Discharge (1812); Unspecified Infection (1930); Pain (1994); Injury (2348); Disability (2371)
|
| Date of Event |
09/08/2017
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention and "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Note, as a specific explant ad event dates were not provided, the date of explant and the date of event were estimated as (b)(6) 2017.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol 3dmax and ventrio.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the ventrio which was implanted on (b)(6) 2016.It is alleged that the patient's mesh removal occurred in 2017.Attorney also alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention and "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Note, as a specific explant ad event dates were not provided, the date of explant and the date of event were estimated as (b)(6) 2017.Addendum: h11: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided and to correct date of event and date of explant.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-feb-2015) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, b4, b5, b7, d3, d4, g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10, h11.Corrected fields: b3 (date of event), d.6b (date of explant).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text: not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol 3dmax and ventrio.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the ventrio which was implanted on (b)(6) 2016.It is alleged that the patient's mesh removal occurred in 2017.Attorney also alleges general allegations for ¿past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2016- patient was diagnosed with incarcerated incisional and ventral hernia, recurrent right inguinal hernia thereby underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic repair with implant of ventrio mesh (device 1) for incisional ventral hernia and 3dmax (device 2) for right inguinal hernia.Per op notes, ¿indirect and component of direct hernia was identified in the right inguinal region.A 3dmax mesh (device 2) was placed in the right inguinal region, sutured using absorbable suture.Then, incarcerated incisional hernia was identified in the epigastric region and ventrio mesh (device 1) was placed and sutured¿.(b)(6) 2017 - patient was diagnosed with infected abdominal wall mesh thereby underwent open repair with explant of ventrio mesh (device 1).Per op notes, ¿the ventrio mesh (device 1) had folded upon itself was excised.Purulent drainage was noted from bottom of mesh.The omentum adherent to the mesh was taken down.¿.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|