|
This complaint from belgium reports a fall that resulted in the broken neck of a polarstem stem ti/ha size 3.The device, which intent use is in treatment, was returned for investigation.The reported failure can be confirmed and a microscopic analysis was performed.About three quarter of the fracture surface show fatigue striations, indicating that the crack prpagated by fatigue.The residual fracture surface is covered by dimples, characteristics of ductile overload.No pores or inclusions, which could have initiated or enhanced crack growth, could be observed on the fracture surface.In the area of assumed crack initiation, scratches have been found which were likely present prior to fracture and may have led to this crack initiation.In our corresponding batch record and material certificate no deviations can be found, which could explain the occured neck breakage.The risk file review shows that the risk of implant fracture is low.For the reported batch number no other complaint can be found.One additional complaint was recorded which reports an implant fracture at the neck of this device.In our current ifu 12.23 ed.05/16 an implant fracture is a known risk which can occur.Three x-rays were provided to review.To date no medical records were submitted with this complaint.Smith and nephew has not received adequate materials (operative reports) to fully evaluate the complaint, but if additional clinically relevant materials are later received, then the case may be re-opened for further evaluation.In conclusion, the root cause of the broken polarstem was likely the reported fall.Smith + nephew will monitor this device for similar issues.
|