| Model Number |
ZCU375 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Capsular Bag Tear (2639)
|
| Date of Event |
12/21/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Weight, ethnicity: information unknown/not provided.Implant date: if implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced during the same procedure.Explant date: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced during the same procedure.Phone number: +1(714)2478552.Device evaluation: the product testing could not be performed as the product was not returned.The reported complaint cannot be confirmed.Manufacturing records review: the manufacturing records for the device were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specifications.A search in complaint system revealed no other complaints have been received for this production order number.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.An attempt has been made to obtain missing information; however, no definitive response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The surgery center reported that a tear in the bag occurred with the patient's right eye and they could not use the lens.It was indicated that the incident occurred after the lens was inserted.There was a vitrectomy performed.The lens was removed and a replacement lens of different model (24.0 diopter) was used.It was noted that the cartridge was discarded.No further information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation? yes; returned to manufacturer on: jan 25, 2021.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection under magnification revealed viscoelastic residue on the optic body and haptics, which is consistent with a lens that was handled during removal and replacement.Lens damage (bent optic body) was observed, however this can be attributed to receiving the lens crushed in the lens insert and cannot be confirmed to be related to manufacturing.The lens was cleaned, and no cosmetic issues were observed.The complaint issue could not be confirmed, and no product deficiency could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|