|
(b)(4).Events reported in mwr-2210968-2021-00578, 2210968-2021-00579, 2210968-2021-00581, 2210968-2021-00582, 2210968-2021-00583, 2210968-2021-00585, and 2210968-2021-00586.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device batch number qcmlbc, and no non-conformances were identified.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.It was originally reported that ¿during multiple procedure that the vet is experiencing a lot of breakage over the past month.Another like device was used to complete the procedure".Could you please confirm how many procedures were affected by suture breakage? could you please provide the dates of these procedures? was there any quality deficiency/ non-conformance noted with the device before use/ during use or during possible re-operation? could you please confirm the device return status/follow up? (30 sterile samples).It was also reported that ¿three patients needed to be re-sutured due to wound dehiscence¿.Could you please confirm if wound dehiscence was a consequence of post-op suture breakage? could you please clarify which affected suture product was used on each patient? could you please provide the initial procedure dates, as well as the re-suturing dates?.
|