|
Event occurred on an unknown date in 2020.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device history lot: manufacturing location: (b)(4).Manufacturing date: jun 14, 2019.Expiration date: may 31, 2029.Part number: 04.037.228s, 12mm/125 deg ti cann tfna 380mm/right - sterile.Lot number: 3l42264 (sterile).One piece was scrapped in cell at op #30, gundrill, for a cannulation runout failure.The remainder of the lot was 100% inspected for this feature and determined to be acceptable.Production order traveler met all inspection acceptance criteria apart from the one piece noted.Inspection sheet, in process / inspect dimensional / final, ns071305 rev f met all inspection acceptance criteria apart from the one piece noted.Inspection sheet, tfna assembly inspection, ns067861 rev b met all inspection acceptance criteria.Packaging label log (pll) lppf rev d, lmd rev a was reviewed and determined to be conforming.Scn 16351 supplied by ethicon (abq) was reviewed and determined to be conforming.This lot met all dimensional, visual, sterility and packaging criteria at the time of release with no issues documented during the manufacture that would contribute to this complaint condition.Component parts reviewed: component parts were not reviewed because the reported complaint condition of ¿removal due to non-union¿ does not indicate breakage or failure of any component part, therefore, dhr review of the raw material(s) would not be relevant to the reported condition.Device history review: this lot met all dimensional, visual, sterility and packaging criteria at the time of release with no issues documented during the manufacture that would contribute to this complaint condition.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2020, the patient had a proximal femur fracture that was treated with a trochanteric fixation nail advanced (tfna) on (b)(6) 2020, and the patient failed to heal.The surgeon decided to convert the patient to a total hip replacement surgery.Removal of the tfna was required to proceed with the desired procedure due to non-union.Procedure outcome is unknown.There was patient consequence.This report is for one (1) 12mm/125 deg ti cann tfna 380mm/right - sterile.This is report 1 of 3 for (b)(4).
|