|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2019 the patient underwent a revision surgery due to the ¿prosthesis fracture¿ of the pinnacle implant, and subsequent ¿replacement of the stem and of the polyethylene liner¿.The above impacted implant was implanted on (b)(6) 2010 after a revision and replacement of the asr implant that the patient received on (b)(6) 2008.Litigation alleges prosthetic fracture.Plaintiff is seeking full compensation for all the damages that had caused her such as permanent biological injury, impaired mobility, limited adl, joint insufficiency, financial losses and social interactions due to defective and lack of safety products implanted.Doi: (b)(6) 2008; dor: (b)(6) 2019: right hip 2nd revision (stem).Doi: (b)(6) 2010; dor: (b)(6) 2019; right hip 2nd revision (cup, liner and head).
|