| Model Number |
61046BX |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Material Separation (1562); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
12/29/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device is scheduled to be returned to olympus, but has not yet arrived.If additional information becomes available, a supplemental report will be filed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported, during the removal of a stone by the uropass device, the material was removed from the uropass and fell into the patient.All the pieces of the stone were successfully removed from the patient.There was no patient harm reported as a result of this event.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Additional information was received on 10feb2021 confirming there were no injuries to the patient.Additionally, the plastic particles that fell into the patient were removed using forceps, which caused approximately a 15 minute delay in the procedure.The patient's overall stay in the facility was not extended.The initial reporter confirmed that the device was inspected prior to use.There was no bleeding, abnormality, or otherwise danger to the patient.The procedure being performed as an unspecified therapeutic procedure.There were no other devices involved and the procedure was successfully completed with a similar device.Patient demographics remain unavailable.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device was returned, and an initial evaluation was conducted by olympus; however, investigation is ongoing.If additional information becomes available prior to the conclusion of the investigation, a supplemental report will be provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This supplemental report is being submitted to provide the results of the manufacturer¿s investigation.A device evaluation and a review of the device history record (dhr) was conducted during this investigation.The device was returned wrapped in a plastic bag, indicating it was a contaminated device.The label for the device had been removed from the original packaging and was included.The device was examined, and it was noted that only the sheathing of the device was provided.The dilator of the device was not returned.There was no notable damage on the sheath.Investigation was unable to confirm the user¿s report since no damage was discovered on the sheath and the dilator was not provided.The review of the dhr did not find any abnormalities or anomalies identified during production.The device met all specifications upon release.From the results of the investigation, determined that there is no manufacturing, material or processing related cause for this failure mode.The root cause has been determined to be environmental exposure of the device, which resulted in degradation and embrittlement of the polymer.Olympus will continue to monitor the field performance of this device.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Upon further review, it was determined that this event is a serious injury.Corrections made to b1, b2, h1 and h6.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information received.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being supplemented to provide a correction to the initial with information inadvertently left out e1-email address, e2, e3, g2, and h6 (type of investigation and medical device problem code).Additionally, to provide a correction to the initial h6- investigation conclusion.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|