|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard mesh (bard flat mesh) on (b)(6) 2003.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the bard mesh (bard flat mesh).Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: on (b)(6) 2003 - patient was diagnosed with left inguinal hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of bard pre-shaped mesh with keyhole (device 1).(note: no information provided in mrr about this procedure).On (b)(6) 2019 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent left inguinal hernia, scar tissue, thereby underwent open repair with implant of perfix plug (device 2).Per operative notes, ¿an incision was made through the subcutaneous tissue into the old scar.The hernia sac was dissected out.All scar tissues were removed.A perfix plug (device 2) was placed into the defect and closed with sutures.¿.
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: h11: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided and to correct the brand name.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Updated fields: a2, b2, b3, b4, b5, b7, d4 (product catalog no., corporate lot no., udi no.), g3, g6, h2, h6, h10, h11.Corrected field: d1 (brand name).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|