• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG PROTEGO T 65; ICD LEAD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG PROTEGO T 65; ICD LEAD Back to Search Results
Model Number 379967
Medical Device Problem Code Over-Sensing (1438)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 01/14/2021
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
After an implantation period of approx.33 months, oversensing on the ventricular channel was reported.The lead was explanted.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Upon receipt, the lead under complaint was subjected to an extensive analysis.The performance of the lead was scrutinized, including a visual and electrical inspection.The analysis showed multiple abrasion marks along the lead.In particular 55cm and 57cm distal to the df4 connector pin the insulation was found damaged due to wear, which is assumed to be the root cause of the reported oversensing.The characteristics of this damage indicate unexpected, excessive wear on the lead.Thus it is assumed that the lead was subject to severe mechanical stress in the implanted state.Causes for elevated stresses are difficult to determine.An accumulation of different factors may impact wear on the lead.These factors include interaction with atypical tissue, significant cardiac motion due to an adverse lead position including slack, or a potential increased ingrowth which had impact on the maneuverability of the lead.Furthermore, tortuous cardiac anatomy, high patient activity levels, and significant manual labor involving the upper body are known contributing factors.Further damages such as a deformed rv shock coil, most likely occurred during the extraction procedure due to tensile stress.The manufacturing process for this device was re-investigated.All production steps had been performed accordingly.There was no sign of any inconsistency during the manufacturing process.In conclusion, the analysis did not reveal any sign of a material or manufacturing problem.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROTEGO T 65
Common Device Name
ICD LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG
woermannkehre 1
berlin 12359
MDR Report Key11243505
Report Number1028232-2021-00519
Device Sequence Number14341837
Product Code NVY
UDI-Device Identifier04035479121686
UDI-Public04035479121686
Combination Product (Y/N)N
PMA/510(K) Number
P980023
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2018
Device Explanted Year2021
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source company representative,foreig
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 01/21/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/31/2019
Device Model Number379967
Device Catalogue NumberSEE MODEL NO.
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/27/2021
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/27/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/30/2021
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/28/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/03/2021
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization;
-
-