• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. RECOVERY FILTER SYSTEM; VENA CAVA FILTER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. RECOVERY FILTER SYSTEM; VENA CAVA FILTER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RF048F
Device Problems Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Malposition of Device (2616); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problem Abdominal Pain (1685)
Event Date 09/06/2003
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing review: a device history record review could not be performed as the lot number is unknown.Investigation summary:the device was not returned for evaluation.Medical records were provided and reviewed.Post placement film demonstrated a bard recovery filter in good position at the level of the l1 vertebral body.Few days post filter deployment, the patient presented with complaint of abdominal pain.Subsequently abdomen 1 view portable revealed inferior vena cava filter was in the region overlying the inferior vena cava.Approximately fourteen years and six months later, computerized tomography (ct) revealed that multiplanar reformations were rendered.There are two right renal veins.The inferior vena cava filter dome was located superior to the more inferior of the two veins and just below the more superior of the two veins.The filter dome was tilted to the right and posteriorly nearly contacting the posterior caval wall.Multiple filter struts penetrated the inferior vena cava by up to 7 mm mostly posteriorly and to the right.The struts did not penetrate or contact the adjacent renal artery or vein or aorta.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for perforation of the inferior vena cava (ivc) and filter tilt.However, the investigation is inconclusive for filter migration.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.The information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event Description
It was reported through the litigation process that some time post filter deployment, the patient allegedly experienced filter perforation, migration, and tilting.There were no reported attempts made to retrieve the filter.The current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RECOVERY FILTER SYSTEM
Type of Device
VENA CAVA FILTER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
1625 w 3rd st.
tempe AZ 85281
Manufacturer (Section G)
C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO)
289 bay road
queensbury NY 12804
Manufacturer Contact
judith ludwig
1415 w. 3rd street
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key11249989
MDR Text Key229291721
Report Number2020394-2021-80137
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K031328
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,health professional
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/29/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/29/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberRF048F
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received01/08/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
IMIPENEM, AMIKACIN, ZYVOX, DURAGESIC PATCH; INDOCIN, ZANTAC, ZINC OXIDE
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age44 YR
-
-