• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ABBOTT VASCULAR XIENCE ALPINE EVEROLIMUS ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM; DRUG ELUTING CORONARY STENT DELIVERY SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ABBOTT VASCULAR XIENCE ALPINE EVEROLIMUS ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM; DRUG ELUTING CORONARY STENT DELIVERY SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK RX ALPINE
Device Problem Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
Patient Problems Thrombosis (2100); Vascular Dissection (3160)
Event Date 11/15/2012
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Dates estimated the adverse patient effects referenced in will be filed under a separate medwatch report #.The additional device referenced is being filed under a separate medwatch report #.The stent remains in patient.The device will not be returned for evaluation.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.The udi is unknown as the part and lot numbers were not provided.Article title: comparison of the vessel healing process after everolimus-eluting stent and bare metal stent implantations in patients with st-elevation myocardial infarctionna.
 
Event Description
It was reported through a research article identifying xience alpine and multilink vision that may be related to the following: patient thrombosis, dissection, malapposition, revascularization, and rehospitalization.This article summarizes clinical outcomes of 42 patients that were treated with xience alpine stents and 21 patients that were treated with multilink vision stents.Specific patient information is documented as unknown.Details are listed in the attached article, titled "comparison of the vessel healing process after everolimus-eluting stent and bare metal stent implantations in patients with st-elevation myocardial infarction.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
B3/d6: dates estimated.B5: the adverse patient effects referenced in b5 will be filed under a separate medwatch report #.B5: the additional device referenced in b5 is being filed under a separate medwatch report #.The device was not returned for evaluation.A review of the lot history record and complaint history of the reported lot could not be conducted because the lot and part number were not provided.A conclusive cause for the reported patient-device incompatibility could not be determined; however, the subsequent treatment appears to be related to the operational context of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture or labeling of the device.The udi is unknown as the part and lot numbers were not provided.Article title: comparison of the vessel healing process after everolimus-eluting stent and bare metal stent implantations in patients with st-elevation myocardial infarctionna.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
XIENCE ALPINE EVEROLIMUS ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
DRUG ELUTING CORONARY STENT DELIVERY SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
ABBOTT VASCULAR
26531 ynez rd.
temecula CA 92591 4628
MDR Report Key11252222
MDR Text Key230233501
Report Number2024168-2021-00722
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIQ
Combination Product (y/n)Y
PMA/PMN Number
P110019
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type literature
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/24/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/29/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK RX ALPINE
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/08/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age66 YR
-
-