|
|
| Catalog Number |
0112670 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Adhesion(s) (1695); Pain (1994); Seroma (2069); Hernia (2240); Injury (2348); Disability (2371)
|
| Date of Event |
01/11/2010
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard mesh (bard flat mesh) and bard/davol ventralight st on (b)(6) 2005 and/or (b)(6) 2011 and/or (b)(6) 2013.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the bard mesh (bard flat mesh).Attorney alleges that the patient sustained injuries on (b)(6) 2010, (b)(6) 2011 and/or (b)(6) 2013.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard mesh (bard flat mesh) and bard/davol ventralight st on (b)(6) 2005 and/or (b)(6) 2011 and/or (b)(6) 2013.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the bard mesh (bard flat mesh).Attorney alleges that the patient sustained injuries on (b)(6) 2010, (b)(6) 2011 and/or (b)(6) 2013.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2005 ¿ patient was diagnosed with symptomatic ventral hernia thereby underwent open repair with the implant of bard flat mesh (device 1).Per operative notes, ¿the patient was found to have a large ventral hernia in the lower half of the incision.A bard flat mesh (device 1) was placed on top of the repair and secured using staples.¿ (b)(6) 2010 ¿ patient was diagnosed with large ventral hernia and intraabdominal adhesions thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with the implant of synthetic mesh.Per operative notes, ¿multiple adhesions were taken down.There was a small hernia defect on left side.A synthetic mesh was placed into abdomen using protack staples.¿ (b)(6) 2011 ¿ patient was diagnosed with recurrent ventral hernia thereby underwent open repair with the removal of synthetic mesh and implant of bard flat mesh (device #2).Per operative notes, ¿the previous synthetic mesh was displaced and pulled more to the midline and adhered to small bowel was excised along with protack staples.A piece of bard flat mesh (device #2) was placed on top of repair using sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2013 ¿ patient was diagnosed with recurrent ventral hernia; seroma thereby underwent open repair with the implant of ventralight st (device 3).Per operative notes, ¿a large seroma on top of mesh (device 1 and device 2) was evacuated.The bard flat mesh (device 2) was pulled to the right side leaving a major defect on the left side of the abdomen.The adhesions were released.The hernia sac was found on left side.A ventralight st mesh (device 3) was placed on the defect and anchored to the fascia using sutures.¿.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Updated fields: a2, b2, b3, b4, b5, b7, d3, d4, g3, g6, h2, h6, h10.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd h3 other text: not returned.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|