| Model Number |
1218-87-652 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Fracture (1260)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Pain (1994)
|
| Date of Event |
01/19/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint #: (b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The surgeon performed total hip arthroplasty using depuy summit stem, depuy pinnacle sector gription shell, depuy 36mm +1.5mm ceramic femoral head and depuy pinnacle 36/52 ceramic liner on the patient in late 2019.In may of 2020, the patient complained to the surgeon of a squeaky hip following participating in a baseball game.In autumn of 2020, patient complained to the surgeon of hip pain, and following x-rays and other assessments, surgeon determined that the patient¿s ceramic liner had fractured.Patient was booked for revision surgery.Surgeon performed revision surgery to remove a fractured 36/52 ceramic liner (121887652) from a 52 sector gription shell (121732052).The hip joint was dislocated, the ceramic liner was assessed and confirmed to be fractured, all the pieces of the liner were removed from the shell and the surrounding wound.The wound was then thoroughly irrigated and then surgeon decided to remove the shell out of an abundance of caution.Shell was removed successfully.Surgeon then proceeded to ream the acetabulum up to 56mm and then implanted a 56mm pinnacle sector gription shell, and after performing trial reduction, followed by implanting a 36/56 pinnacle ceramic liner, and a delta ts 36 +5 ceramic head.Surgeon then reduced the hip and closed the wound.Surgery completed successfully.No additional information is available.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H10 additional narrative: added: d4 (lot), d6a, h4.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Corrected: b3, d1, d2b, d4 (catalog and udi), d6b.Udi (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary - no device associated with this report was received for examination.A review of the device manufacturing records found no related deviations or anomalies.The information received will be retained for potential series investigations if triggered by trend analysis, post market surveillance, or other events within the quality system.Depuy considers the investigation closed.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed, and the investigation will be re-opened as necessary.Device history lot - protocols and certificate of conformance were reviewed.The quality documents show that the values obtained on the ceramic liner are according to specifications valid at the time of production.There are no indications of any pre-existing material defect.Device history review - protocols and certificate of conformance were reviewed.The quality documents show that the values obtained on the ceramic liner are according to specifications valid at the time of production.There are no indications of any pre-existing material defect.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|