|
|
| Catalog Number |
5959812 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190); Migration (4003)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Adhesion(s) (1695); Pain (1994); Hernia (2240); Injury (2348); Disability (2371); Obstruction/Occlusion (2422)
|
| Date of Event |
08/25/2014
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard/davol sepramesh ip (device #2).Additional emdrs were submitted to represent the bard/davol composix kugel hernia patch (device #1) and ventralex st (device #3).Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol composix kugel hernia patch, sepramesh composite ip and ventralex st on (b)(6) 2007 and/or (b)(6) 2010 and/or (b)(6) 2014.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against all devices.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol composix kugel hernia patch, sepramesh composite ip and ventralex st on (b)(6) 2007 and/or (b)(6) 2010 and/or (b)(6) 2014.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against all devices.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2007 ¿ patient was diagnosed with recurrent incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with the implant of composix kugel mesh (device 1).Per op notes, ¿the patient had multiple recurrent incisional hernias and another recurrence to right of prior synthetic mesh.The hernia sac was dissected, and the prior synthetic mesh was pulled away from fascia.A small composix kugel (device 1) was placed to bridge the fascial defect and sutured.¿ (b)(6) 2010 ¿ patient was diagnosed with recurrent ventral hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic to open repair with the removal of mesh (device 1) and implant of sepramesh ip (device 2).Per op notes, ¿the adhesions inferiorly and a herniation inferior to incision.There were small bowel loops of multiple that were densely adherent to both synthetic mesh in the umbilicus and to the composix kugel mesh (device 1) in the right upper umbilicus quadrant and synthetic mesh in left upper quadrant.All the meshes (device 1) were removed.The resultant abdominal wall defect within the fascia in right upper quadrant.A piece of sepramesh ip (device 2) was placed within the abdominal wall and secured using absorbable tacks.¿ (b)(6) 2014 ¿ patient was diagnosed with recurrent abdominal wall hernia; obstruction thereby underwent laparoscopic and open repair with the implant of ventralex st mesh (device 3).Per op notes, ¿the hernia sac was dissected from subcutaneous tissue down to the fascia.There was a eventration of abdominal wall.Adhesion to the hernia sac and small bowel, mesh.The previously placed sepramesh ip (device 2) had pulled away medially from the abdominal wall at the right superior edge of mesh.A round ventralex st patch (device 3) was placed within peritoneal cavity and sutured circumferentially to fascia and previous mesh (device 2) medially.¿.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-jun-2010) is considered to be a best estimate.This supplemental emdr represents the bard/davol sepramesh ip (device 2).Additional supplemental emdrs were submitted to represent the bard/davol mesh - composix kugel (device 1) and ventralex st (device 3).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|