|
One used 6 fr angio-seal evolution device was returned for product evaluation.The evolution device body was returned mated with hemostasis sheath along with the header bag.No other accessory components were returned.Visual inspection revealed that the evolution body was found to be mated with the hemostasis sheath and the deployment sleeve was in the rear lock position with the color bands fully exposed.The anchor was observed dangling at the distal tip of the hemostasis sheath.Additionally, the button of the device was noted soft upon receipt.No other visual anomalies were noted with the device.Functional testing was performed.Digital force was applied to the anchor, deploying the collagen and suture unspooled releasing the compaction tube from the hemostasis sheath.Once the green mark on the tamper tube was visible, button was pressed to release the remaining suture.No functional anomalies were noted.For further evaluation, the gearbox assembly was visually inspected.The rack was observed in the proximal position and the suture could be seen tethered to the green suture stake.No turns of the suture could be seen wrapped around the spool.Then, the gears were rotated in both directions with corresponding rack movement; no resistance was encountered as the rack moved.No functional anomalies were noted.Based on the evaluation performed, the complaint could be confirmed for the failure mode of "pullout".The squeaky screeching noise that was heard during the functional testing was likely due to negative force on the compaction tube which stressed the drive gear mechanism exacerbated by the accumulation of the blood like substances due to the used state of the device.The compaction tube did not release due to obstruction by dried blood like substances which solidified during transit and storage of the used device post usage.The compaction tube was dimensionally tested, and no anomalies were identified.No anomalies were found on the rack during functional testing.Based on the available information, the exact cause of the issue cannot be determined.The device was in a conforming state when released from terumo control.There is no indication that any manufacturing, design or quality system issues may have led to this event.Currently, no action is recommended since this risk evaluation is within the predetermined limits in the fmea.
|