|
|
| Catalog Number |
0010214 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Unspecified Infection (1930); Pain (1994); Injury (2348); Disability (2371); Fibrosis (3167)
|
| Date of Event |
01/14/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention and "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol ventrio and phasix on (b)(6) 2015 and/or (b)(6) 2020.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the ventrio.Attorney alleges that the patient sustained unspecified injuries on (b)(6) 2020 (hence the date of implant for ventrio is considered as (b)(6) 2015).Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient.¿ it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard/davol ventrio and phasix on (b)(6) 2015 and/or (b)(6) 2020.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the ventrio.Attorney alleges that the patient sustained unspecified injuries on (b)(6) 2020 (hence the date of implant for ventrio is considered as (b)(6) 2015).Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient.¿ it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2015 ¿ patient was diagnosed with incisional hernia with chronic incarceration thereby underwent open repair with implant of ventrio mesh (device #1).Per operative notes, ¿incarcerated omentum was encountered in a hernia sac was excised.A ventrio mesh (device #1) was placed and secured using sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2020 ¿ patient was diagnosed with infected abdominal wall mesh thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with removal of ventrio mesh (device #1) and an implant of phasix flat mesh (device #2) and synthetic mesh.Per operative notes, ¿the ventrio mesh (device #1) with gelatinous fibrinous infected tissue was encountered and excised.A piece of synthetic mesh was placed on the bowel and a phasix flat mesh (device #2) was placed below the fascia using sutures.¿.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention and "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-sep-2014) is considered to be a best estimate.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|