|
Event description: it was reported that the patient was implanted in the left hip with a wagner sl revision stem on (b)(6) 2010.Subsequently, on (b)(6) 2021 the patient fell on the ground while walking, after which she was painful with limited range of motion and instability.A radiographic evaluation showed a stem fracture due to which the patient underwent revision surgery on (b)(6) 2021.Review of received data: due diligence: no further due diligence required as all required information to support the conclusion is available or was already requested.X-rays: a photograph of a x-ray with four views was obtained.As the x-ray image was photographed, it has a low resolution due to reflections.Based on the depicted views, the reported stem fracture can be confirmed; however, due to the low image quality, a more accurate assessment could not be made.Images: two pictures of the removed wagner stem have been obtained.The first image depicts the complete stem, which is broken in the upper third of the stem.The fracture runs perpendicular to the stem axis.The second image shows a close-up of the lot number.Due to the low image resolution of both images, a more detailed assessment could not be performed.Patient data: e.K., female, born in 1929, 65kg, 165cm.Product evaluation: no product was returned; therefore, visual and dimensional evaluation could not be performed.Review of product documentation: device purpose: this device is intended for treatment.Product compatibility: the compatibility check could not be performed as only the complained product is known.Dhr review: review of the device history records identified no deviations or anomalies during manufacturing.Conclusion: it was reported that the patient was implanted in the left hip with a wagner sl revision stem on (b)(6) 2010.More than 10 years later, on (b)(6) 2021, the patient fell on the ground while walking, after which her hip was painful with limited range of motion and instability.A radiographic evaluation showed a stem fracture due to which the patient underwent revision surgery on (b)(6) 2021.The quality records show that all specified characteristics have met the specifications valid at the time of production.Therefore, the investigation did not identify a nonconformance or a complaint out of box (coob).The stem was not sent in for examination.However, based on the images and radiographs received, the reported stem fracture can be confirmed.However, due to the poor image quality, a detailed assessment could not be made; therefore, an exact cause could not be determined.The need for corrective measures is not indicated and zimmer switzerland manufacturing gmbh considers this case as closed.Zimmer biomet¿s reference number of this file is (b)(4).
|