| Model Number |
Z9002 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Date of event: unknown, not provided.If implanted, give date: not applicable, as the lens was not implanted.If explanted, give date: not applicable, as the lens was not implanted; therefore, it was not explanted.Device evaluation: product evaluation was not performed because the product has not been returned.The complaint issue reported could not be verified and no product deficiency could be identified.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing process record was evaluated and revealed that the product was manufactured and released according to specifications.A search revealed one additional complaint was received from this production order.But this complaint meets the criteria for no further investigation to be performed.No product malfunction or deficiency could be observed, and no escalations are required.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that an intraocular lens (iol) was opened but not used.The haptic broke while being injected into the eye.It was noted that the iol did touch the patient.It was then cut out and replaced with a new one.It was learned that there was no vitrectomy, sutures, incision enlargement, and no capsule tear.No post-op injuries are reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: section d9.Device available for evaluation? yes returned to manufacturer on: 2/25/2021 section h3.Device evaluated by manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection under magnification revealed viscoelastic residue on the optic body and haptics and that the lens was received cut in half (only one half received), which is consistent with a lens handled during removal and replacement.Haptic damage (bent) was observed on a separated haptic (haptic detached could not be observed because only one half a lens was returned).Based on the return condition of the lens no further product evaluation could be performed.The complaint issue was confirmed, however this can be attributed to handling and cannot be confirmed to be related to manufacturing and no product deficiency could be identified.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|