H.10: as reported in the initial report, the serial number of device was not stated within the report.It was unclear if device used during 2014 surgery and 2019 surgery is the same (b4 indicated for both surgeries).A second medwatch mw5098576 report was submitted for this customer facility and comparing both reports, it reasonable to assume that the serial number of the device used in 2019 surgery is 16s17157.However, even if from the event description provided in this specific case, it seems that device used in 2014 and 2019 is the same, this is not possible since 16s17157 was manufactured in 2016.Thus, it is reasonable to assume that the same serial number 16s17157 was used for 2019 surgery on this patient and also in another surgery on another patient captured under mw5098576 (as stated within the mw report, the device was used also on a second patient).The device used in 2014 for this patient remains unknown.A device (16s17157) service history review has been performed and identified that the unit was manufactured in 2016.The device 16s17157 was not yet upgraded with vacuum and sealing kit at the time of 2019 surgery.A review of the dhr did not identify any deviations or non-conformities relevant to the reported issue.Through follow-up communication livanova learned that the device was cleaned regularly as per instruction for use and that it was placed inside the operating theater with the fan directed away from the surgical field.No additional information is currently available on this specific case and the root cause could not be determined.
|