• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. GII PS INSERT SZ 3-4 9MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. GII PS INSERT SZ 3-4 9MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL Back to Search Results
Model Number 71420816
Medical Device Problem Codes Break (1069); Material Fragmentation (1261)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Failure of Implant (1924); Pain (1994)
Date of Event 01/20/2021
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference number: (b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that, a revision surgery was performed in order to replace a genesis ii ps insert size 3-4 9mm.The surgery was performed due to the pain experienced by the patient, and because it was confirmed through a scan that a polyethylene fragment was present in the quadricipital cul-de-sac.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental report will be submitted accordingly.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Results of investigation: the associated device was returned and evaluated.Visual examination of the insert showed wear-related damage and discoloration to the articular surface.Yellowish discoloration of the polyethylene of implants can occur when exposed to fluids in or around a joint.Macroscopic/microscopic examination of the insert showed damage related to the fracturing of the post on the post region surface.Macroscopic/microscopic examination of the fractured post showed damage to the posterior surface.In addition, macroscopic/microscopic examination of the fractured post showed no damage to the anterior surface.No additional unexpected visual features noted.No evidence of deviation in processing or material was found for the retrieved item.Destructive testing was not performed during this examination.No definitive conclusions as to the cause of these issues can be determined.A review of complaint history revealed similar events for the listed device, but no similar events for the batch, this failure mode will be monitored for future complaints for any necessary corrective actions.The clinical/medical evaluation concluded that this case reports a revision was performed due to pain, which was found to be caused by a poly fragment in the quadricipital cul-de-sac.To date, the requested surgical report and x-rays have not been provided.Therefore, the patient impact beyond the revision cannot be determined.Due to the limited information provided, no further clinical assessment can be rendered at this time.Should additional clinically relevant documentation become available, the clinical/medical task may be re-opened.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.At this time, we do not have reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.The manufacturing process of the device did not contribute to the reported event.A review of the risk management file and instructions for use document revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.Assessment of historical escalated cases concluded that there are no prior actions related to this device and failure mode.Possible causes could include but not limited to traumatic injury, patient anatomy or abnormal loading of limb.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GII PS INSERT SZ 3-4 9MM
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key11326554
Report Number1020279-2021-01303
Device Sequence Number858326
Product Code JWH
UDI-Device Identifier03596010209573
UDI-Public03596010209573
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryFR
PMA/510(K) Number
K951987
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2009
Device Explanted Year2021
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/04/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/29/2019
Device Model Number71420816
Device Catalogue Number71420816
Device Lot Number09AT27342
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/02/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/25/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/21/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/15/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/04/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/31/2009
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age69 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-