|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: h11: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided and to correct brand name pma/50(k)#.Root cause is in-conclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-apr-2013) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, b3, b4, b5, b7, d3, d4, d.6b (date of explant), g1, g3, g4, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10, h11.Corrected fields: d1 (brand name), g4 (pma/510(k)#).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol composix on (b)(6) 2013.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the composix.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2013 ¿ patient had anterior wall defect thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with the implant of composix e/x mesh.Per operative notes, ¿the composix e/x mesh was placed against anterior abdominal wall using tacks.¿ (b)(6) 2013 ¿ patient had abdominal pain, abdominopelvic mass thereby underwent laparoscopic dissection of abdominopelvic mass, lysis of pelvic and abdominal adhesion, dilation and curettage.(b)(6) 2013 ¿ patient was diagnosed with infected lower abdominal mesh thereby underwent open repair with the removal of mesh.Per operative notes, ¿the mesh was completely dissected off and biological mesh placed to rectus sheath using sutures.¿.
|