BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) BD PHOENIX NMIC-501; SYSTEM, TEST, AUTO, ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY, SHORT INCUBATION
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 449041 |
Device Problem
Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535)
|
Patient Problems
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 01/22/2021 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Initial reporter phone #: (b)(6).A device evaluation is anticipated, but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental report will be filed.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported while using bd phoenix¿ nmic-501 2 strains k.Pneumoniae carrying the resistance mechanism kpc and sensitive ceftazidime / avibactam, were passed through the nmic 501 panel obtaining erroneous results.Resulting mbl and resistant ceftazidime / avibactam.The strains were confirmed as carriers of kpc discs and the carriage of mbl was ruled out.No treatment based on erroneous results.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: strain1: from urine culture: sensitivity is performed using the phoenix nmic-501 panel and disc antibiogram.The mechanism was confirmed using synergy with boronic acid and edta, testing positive only with boronic acid and also using the kit: kpc, mbl and oxa-48 confirm kit: carbapenemases from rosco.The determination of sensitivity to ceftazidime avibactam was performed with liofilchem brand discs, resulting in sensitive by disc and resistant by panel.Strain 2: from tracheal aspirate: sensitivity is performed using the phoenix nmic-501 panel and manually.The mechanism was confirmed using synergy with boronic acid and edta, testing positive only with boronic acid and also using the kit: kpc, mbl and oxa-48 confirm kit: carbapenemases rosco.The sensitivity to ceftazidime avibactam was sensitive by both methodologies.In both strains, the nmic-501 panel detected an mbl mechanism, instead, manually, only the presence of kpc-type carbapenemase was observed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation summary: this complaint investigation is only applicable to exus panel formats only.This complaint is for incorrect ambler classification as well as false resistance of ceftazidime / avibactam when using nmic 501 (449041) batch 0071520.Lab report results were provided by the customer, but no product returns or isolates were provided for investigation.It is to be noted that an alternate method was used for this patient.To investigate, a total of three retention panels from this complaint batch were tested using a phoenix 100 instrument.One panel was tested for class a (kpc) using qc isolate klebsiella pneumoniae atcc 14780), and yielded the correct result of class a.One panel was tested for class b (ndm) using in house isolate escherichia coli 18187, and yielded the correct result of class b.One complaint was tested for cpo negative using qc isolate escherichia coli a25922, and yielded the correct result of cpo negative.Additionally, all three panels were tested for ceftazidime / avibactam and yielded the correct mics per the package insert.This complaint is not confirmed.A review of quality notifications revealed no quality notifications generated on the complaint batch.A review of complaints revealed two additional complaints on the complaint batch.Complaint trending was performed and no trends were identified associated with this defect.Bd id/ast plant quality will continue to monitor for trends and take action as necessary.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported while using bd phoenix¿ nmic-501 2 strains k.Pneumoniae carrying the resistance mechanism kpc and sensitive ceftazidime / avibactam, were passed through the nmic 501 panel obtaining erroneous results.Resulting mbl and resistant ceftazidime / avibactam.The strains were confirmed as carriers of kpc discs and the carriage of mbl was ruled out.No treatment based on erroneous results.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: strain1: from urine culture: sensitivity is performed using the phoenix nmic-501 panel and disc antibiogram.The mechanism was confirmed using synergy with boronic acid and edta, testing positive only with boronic acid and also using the kit: kpc, mbl and oxa-48 confirm kit: carbapenemases from rosco.The determination of sensitivity to ceftazidime avibactam was performed with liofilchem brand discs, resulting in sensitive by disc and resistant by panel.Strain 2: from tracheal aspirate: sensitivity is performed using the phoenix nmic-501 panel and manually.The mechanism was confirmed using synergy with boronic acid and edta, testing positive only with boronic acid and also using the kit: kpc, mbl and oxa-48 confirm kit: carbapenemases rosco.The sensitivity to ceftazidime avibactam was sensitive by both methodologies.In both strains, the nmic-501 panel detected an mbl mechanism, instead, manually, only the presence of kpc-type carbapenemase was observed.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|