|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a moderately calcified lesion located in the anterior tibial artery.The balance middleweight 014 3cm guide wire was advanced and used in the procedure without issue; however, during removal, resistance was noted with the intravascular ultrasound catheter (ivus) and the wire separated.The separated segment was successfully snared and removed from the patient.There was no adverse patient sequela or a clinically significant delay.No additional information was provided.
|
|
H6 medical device problem code 2017: improper removal.The device was not returned to abbott vascular for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other incidents and/or complaints reported from this lot.It should be noted that instructions for use (ifu) guide wire hi-torque guide wires ce, fda states: carefully observe the instructions under ¿do not¿ and ¿do¿ below.Failure to do so may result in vessel trauma, guide wire damage, guide wire tip separation, or stent damage.If resistance is observed at any time, determine the cause under fluoroscopy and take remedial action as needed.Do not push, auger, withdraw or torque a guide wire that meets resistance.In this case, the reported ifu violation of force against resistance does appear to have contributed to the core separation; however, the force used appears to be required to remove the device given the clinical situation.There was no damage noted to the guide wire during the inspection prior to use which suggests a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling did not contribute to the reported difficulties.The investigation determined the reported difficulty to remove and material separation appears to be related to operational circumstances of the procedure.Based on the reported information, it is likely that during the procedure, the guide wire became damaged against the ultrasound device used causing the difficulty to remove.Manipulation and/or mishandling of the guidewire against resistance ultimately resulted in the reported core separation.Additionally, the treatment appears to be related to the operational context of the procedure as the separated segment was successfully snared and removed from the patient.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.D9, h3: device not available for evaluation.
|