|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: investigation summary: according to the information provided, it was reported that during the surgery of pcl reconstruction, the anchor was broken off (as the photo shows), removed all the pieces.No additional information could be provided.The product was returned to mitek for evaluation and a photo was provided.Mitek then conducted visual inspection of device received and photo provided by customer.The complaint device was received and inspected.Visual observation indicated that the anchor was broken from the distal part, the external geometry of the screw appeared to be slightly stripped.The photo provided showed the same condition found during the physical evaluation.As a potential cause cannot be associated to manufacturing, therefore a manufacturing record evaluation is not required.This complaint can be confirmed.No information was provided on how or when the failure has occurred, therefore a definitive root cause could not be determined.The possible root cause can be related when it was off angle or excessive force was used causing the screw to break.For the stripped can be attribute when the screwdriver was not seated properly in the screw head and while attempting the insertion caused the screw treads and or screw head to become stripped / unable to advance.However, it cannot be conclusively affirmed.As per ifu, it is mandatory to completely seat the milagro interference screw onto the correct driver for proper implant delivery.Also, notching and/or tapping are necessary when inserting the interference screw with bone tendon grafts.Each device is visually inspected during manufacturing to ensure the device meets the required specifications prior to shipment.Rupture complaint information is consistently analyzed and monitored by quality assurance to determine when further action is necessary.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, in depuy synthes mitek, additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: d9, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|