The customer reported that : "patient operated for a pertrochanteric fracture of the right femur on (b)(6) 2020 in emergency.Poses nail range, simple suite, 3 months after the patient is taken back to the or due to the failure of the osteosynthesis material by right total hip revision prosthesis.Simple follow-up again with resumption of gait the gamma nail is ruptured at the junction with the cervical screw.[.] the broken part of the system is the "trochanteric nail".".
|
The reported event could be confirmed with the help of x-rays and the report provided.The device inspection was not possible as the product was not returned for investigation.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.Formal medical opinion was sought from an experienced independent medical expert as below; ¿in the one provided image received this is difficult to assess, but there are two aspects that are remarkable.First: the reposition of the fracture is not perfect.A pretty big fracture line can be identified in the image.The other aspect is that the lag screw is positioned pretty eccentrical.From only one plane this cannot be assessed completely, but it looks, as if the screw is positioned caudally.It appears as if it is positioned anteriorly as well, but that could only be said together with the other plane.Potentially, the age may have contributed to a poor fracture healing.Beside the fracture pattern with the basicervical fracture line which is sometimes challenging, the poor fracture reduction and the eccentrical position of the lag screw may have contributed to a delayed resp.Non-union with the consequent device failure.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.The instructions for use instructs user that: ¿the implant is intended for temporary bone fixation.In the event of a delay in bone consolidation, or if such consolidation does not take place, or if explantation is not carried out, complications may occur, for example fracture or loosening of the implant or instability of the implant system.Regular post-operative examinations (e.G.X-ray checks) are advisable.¿ based on investigation, the root cause was primarily attributed to a user related issue i.E.Poor fracture reduction along with the patient factor i.E.Poor healing due to age.Medical expert opinion also states ¿the poor fracture reduction and the eccentrical position of the lag screw may have contributed to a delayed resp.Non-union with the consequent device failure.¿ if device is returned or any further information is provided, the investigation report will be reassessed.
|