• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL TROCHANTERIC NAIL KIT, TI GAMMA3 11X180MM X 125; ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL TROCHANTERIC NAIL KIT, TI GAMMA3 11X180MM X 125; ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES Back to Search Results
Model Number 3125-1180S
Device Problem Fracture (1260)
Patient Problems Failure of Implant (1924); Pain (1994); Non-union Bone Fracture (2369); Implant Pain (4561)
Event Date 08/19/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device will not be returned.If additional information becomes available, it will be provided in a supplemental report.
 
Event Description
The customer reported that : "patient operated for a pertrochanteric fracture of the right femur on (b)(6) 2020 in emergency.Poses nail range, simple suite, 3 months after the patient is taken back to the or due to the failure of the osteosynthesis material by right total hip revision prosthesis.Simple follow-up again with resumption of gait the gamma nail is ruptured at the junction with the cervical screw.[.] the broken part of the system is the "trochanteric nail".".
 
Event Description
The customer reported that : "patient operated for a pertrochanteric fracture of the right femur on (b)(6) 2020 in emergency.Poses nail range.Simple suite.3 months after the patient is taken back to the or due to the failure of the osteosynthesis material by right total hip revision prosthesis.Simple follow-up again with resumption of gait.The gamma nail is ruptured at the junction with the cervical screw.The broken part of the system is the "trochanteric nail".".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event could be confirmed with the help of x-rays and the report provided.The device inspection was not possible as the product was not returned for investigation.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.Formal medical opinion was sought from an experienced independent medical expert as below; ¿in the one provided image received this is difficult to assess, but there are two aspects that are remarkable.First: the reposition of the fracture is not perfect.A pretty big fracture line can be identified in the image.The other aspect is that the lag screw is positioned pretty eccentrical.From only one plane this cannot be assessed completely, but it looks, as if the screw is positioned caudally.It appears as if it is positioned anteriorly as well, but that could only be said together with the other plane.Potentially, the age may have contributed to a poor fracture healing.Beside the fracture pattern with the basicervical fracture line which is sometimes challenging, the poor fracture reduction and the eccentrical position of the lag screw may have contributed to a delayed resp.Non-union with the consequent device failure.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.The instructions for use instructs user that: ¿the implant is intended for temporary bone fixation.In the event of a delay in bone consolidation, or if such consolidation does not take place, or if explantation is not carried out, complications may occur, for example fracture or loosening of the implant or instability of the implant system.Regular post-operative examinations (e.G.X-ray checks) are advisable.¿ based on investigation, the root cause was primarily attributed to a user related issue i.E.Poor fracture reduction along with the patient factor i.E.Poor healing due to age.Medical expert opinion also states ¿the poor fracture reduction and the eccentrical position of the lag screw may have contributed to a delayed resp.Non-union with the consequent device failure.¿ if device is returned or any further information is provided, the investigation report will be reassessed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TROCHANTERIC NAIL KIT, TI GAMMA3 11X180MM X 125
Type of Device
ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL
prof. kuentscher-strasse 1-5
schoenkirchen/kiel D-242 32
GM  D-24232
MDR Report Key11345204
MDR Text Key232444863
Report Number0009610622-2021-00281
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HSB
UDI-Device Identifier04546540375070
UDI-Public04546540375070
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K034002
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/16/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model Number3125-1180S
Device Catalogue Number31251180S
Device Lot NumberK05055D
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/26/2021
Initial Date FDA Received02/18/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/26/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/16/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age81 YR
Patient Weight64
-
-