|
Complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.The investigation could not be completed.No conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Device report from synthes reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that the patient underwent the open reduction internal fixation surgery for the proximal humeral fracture.Before the surgery, when the hospital checked the devices, a drill bit couldnt be inserted into the drill sleeve.No further information is available.This report is for one (1) compression drill guide f/3.5 mm lcp percutaneous instr sys.This is report 1 of 2 for complaint (b)(4).
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H3, h6: part: 03.113.013, lot: 9901067, manufacturing site: hägendorf, release to warehouse date: may 11, 2016.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformances were identified.The visual inspection has shown that there are slight deformations at the edges of the bore at the forefront of the device are visible.It can be assumed that the compressed material at these deformations did lead to the complained malfunction.In general is the device is a very used condition, especially the laser markings are partially faded and discolored from often reprocessing.Dimensional analysis did not detect any deviation from the specification.It should be noted that product failure is multifactorial.Based on the information currently available it can be concluded that normal wear and tear over the years did lead to a slight deformation at the forefront of the device, which finally caused the complained malfunction.As part of depuy synthes quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|