| Model Number |
ISERT 250 (+24.50 D) |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
01/13/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This initial emdr is being submitted to fda for outside us like products reporting.Manufacturer's codes for patient health effects (clinical and impact), and device problem and component have been entered in this report.Manufacturer's codes for investigation type, findings and conclusion are pending the completion of the product investigation.Once the investigation is completed, an follow-up report will be submitted to fda which will include the manufacturer's codes for investigation type, findings and conclusion.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Broken haptic during use; all steps were fine; at the end of implantation the haptic broke off.Product replaced with another lens immediately during surgery; patient has recovered and is fine.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This follow-up #1 emdr is being submitted to fda for a reportable adverse event that occurred outside of the usa.The report includes corrected information and additional information not available/included in the initial report.Corrected information: d9 - device available - corrected to no.Additional information: g6 - type of report - noted as follow-up #1.H2 - type of follow-up - noted for corrected and additional information.H3 - device evaluatted - noted that device was not returned.H6 - added codes for manufacturer's investigation: type; findings; and conclusion.The investigation was conducted, with the methods and results as noted below.The product was not returned.No abnormalities were found in production and inspection records of the product.(serial no.: (b)(6); model: 250).In addition, research in our complaint database indicated there were not any similar complaints in the same production lot numbers.The exact root cause was not determined.However, we believe this event was not caused by our product quality.Risk analysis was conducted on the product line and failure code is noted below.A review of the most recent complaint trending data indicates that no significant trends have been identified at this time and no capa is required as part of the product evaluation.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Broken haptic during use; all steps were fine; at the end of implantation the haptic broke off.Product replaced with another lens immediately during surgery; patient has recovered and is fine.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|