|
Investigation: visual inspection: a deformation of the outer housing of the prosa valve and deposits in the outlet spout of the prosa were observed through the visual inspection.Permeability test: a permeability test has indicated that the prosa valve has a blockage and that the progav2.0 is permeable.Adjustment test: the prosa was tested and is not adjustable throughout the normal range.The progav 2.0 was adjustable to all specified pressures.Braking force and brake function test: the brake functionality test of the prosa has shown that the brake function is operational, however the braking force cannot be measured due to the non-adjustability of the valve.The brake function of the progav 2.0 is fully operational and the braking force is within the given tolerances.Computer controlled test: to investigate the clinical claim of underdrainage, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer controlled testing apparatus which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.Due to the blockage of the prosa valve, a computer controlled test was not possible.The progav 2.0 operates within the accepted tolerance.Results: first, we performed a visual inspection of the prosa shunt system.A deformation of the outer housing of the prosa valve was observed through the visual inspection.The deformation was confirmed through a measurement of the parallelism of the valve housing.Additional were visible deposits in the outlet spout of the prosa valve.Next, we tested the permeability, adjustability, and opening pressure of the valve, as well as the brake functionality and brake force.The prosa valve was neither permeable nor adjustable.Furthermore, while the brake functionality was present, the braking force was unable to be measured due to the non - adjustability.The progav 2.0 valve operates as expected and met all specifications.Finally, we have dismantled the valves.Inside both valves we have found build-up of substances (likely protein).Based on the investigation, we confirm the presence of occlusion in the system at the time of investigation.This is likely due to the deposits observed inside the valves.As described in scientific literature, the problem encountered is one of the known, inevitable risks of hc-therapy by shunt implants.The cause of the deformation of the prosa valve and the resultant blockage of the rotor could not be determined through our investigation.Significant outside pressure, for example by too much force from the prosa adjustment tool or by a fall or impact to the head of the patient, can compromise the integrity of the valve.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The shunt system met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.No further regulatory actions are required from our point of view.
|