|
(b)(4).Batch # t94d85.The product was returned to ethicon endo surgery for evaluation.Visual inspection and functional testing were conducted on the returned device.The device was received with the top of the i-blade fractured and slightly lifted and the upper jaw detached not returned.In addition, the electrode ceramic was no separation as reported.The device was connected to the generator and it was recognized.Because the i blade was damaged not all functional testing could be performed with the generator.The condition of the blade prevented the functionality of the jaw.The jaw was unable to cycle open and close.It should be noted that product failure is multifactorial.A probable cause of the damage to the i blade could be not allowing thick and fibrous tissues to denature prior to i-blade advancement.As part of ethicon endo surgery quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device batch number, and no non-conformances were identified.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: what part of the device is the ¿tip¿? did the electrode ceramic separate or break off? did the i blade get damaged or break off? is the jaw damaged but not broken off? is the top jaw loose but not detached? is the top jaw ptc material damaged? is the black ptc in the upper jaw detached? is the top jaw broken off the of the device? was the missing piece retrieved from the patient? what efforts were made to locate the missing piece? answer = customer didn¿t include any additional information in the official report sent to us.I followed up and wasn¿t able to find the answers to the questions below.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|