• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT MAGNA PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT, HEART-VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT MAGNA PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT, HEART-VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3000
Medical Device Problem Code Fluid/Blood Leak (1250)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Pulmonary Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4452)
Date of Event 12/23/2020
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Regurgitation/insufficiency which develops progressively over time can be due to a number of issues including patient-related factors or structural valve deterioration.Structural valve deterioration (svd) is the most common reason for bioprosthesis explants and encompasses multiple failure modes, including calcification, non-calcific degeneration, dehiscence, cusp thickening or fibrosis, or a combination of these.Such failure modes may occur singularly or concomitantly.Regurgitation may also develop progressively if host fibrotic tissue, or pannus, grows onto the bioprosthetic valve.Pannus, a cause of nonstructural dysfunction, may interfere with the functionality of the device by restricting the leaflet motion leading to abnormal coaptation.Alternatively, nonstructural dysfunction (nsvd) may also play a role in the development of valvular stenosis and/or regurgitation.The root cause of this event cannot be conclusively determined with the available information.However, the regurgitation, in this case, was most likely impacted by the progression of the patient's underlying valvular disease pathology with or without structural valve deterioration and/or nonstructural dysfunction.In addition, other patient risk factors such as the patient's younger age at implant may have contributed to this event.The subject device is not available for evaluation, as it remains implanted in the patient.The device history record (dhr) review was completed and this device passed all manufacturing and sterilization inspections prior to release for distribution.There were no issues identified that would have impacted this event.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, an appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a patient with a 29mm 3000 aortic valve, implanted in the pulmonary position, underwent a valve-in-valve after an implant duration of nine (9) years, 11 months due to pulmonary insufficiency.The tpvr was performed with a 29mm 9600tfx.On pod #1, the patient was discharged home in stable condition.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT MAGNA PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS
Common Device Name
REPLACEMENT, HEART-VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
MDR Report Key11373395
Report Number2015691-2021-01418
Device Sequence Number3774346
Product Code DYE
UDI-Device Identifier00690103162288
UDI-Public00690103162288
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMI
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P860057/S18
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2011
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source health professional,user faci
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 02/24/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/01/2014
Device Model Number3000
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/02/2021
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/24/2021
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization; Life Threatening; Required Intervention;
Patient Age34 YR
Patient Weight106
-
-