• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL LP; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL LP; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Model Number RBYLP0304
Device Problems Break (1069); Premature Separation (4045)
Patient Problem Perforation (2001)
Event Date 11/17/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Please note that this complaint was submitted to the fda by the user facility with the following reference number: mw5098642.The product was not returned for evaluation.Without the return of the device, the root cause of the problem cannot be determined.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the left profunda branch using a ruby coil lp, a non-penumbra support catheter, a non-penumbra balloon stent, a non-penumbra stent, and non-penumbra sheath.During the procedure, the physician placed a balloon stent to cover a perforation of the left superficial femoral artery (sfa); however, the perforation persisted.Next, the physician performed a second angiogram at a different angled that revealed the perforation was off a small profunda branch.It was reported that the perforation was the result of a guidewire being used to deliver the sheath at the beginning of the procedure.Subsequently, prolonged balloon inflation did not resolve the perforation.Afterwards, the physician attempted to place a ruby coil lp into the left profunda perforating branch; however, it was unsuccessful as the vessel measured approximately 0.5 millimeters and access was lost to the left profunda perforating branch.Therefore, the physician decided to retract the ruby coil lp.Upon retraction, the ruby coil lp got stuck at the tip of the support catheter.Subsequently, the ruby coil lp unintentionally detached in the sfa.Therefore, the detached ruby coil lp was removed.Then, while attempting to place a stent from the proximal end of the previously placed balloon stent to the proximal end of the sfa, the physician noticed a part of the ruby coil lp was in the proximal sfa.It was reported that part of the ruby coil lp sheared off at the tip of the support catheter.Therefore, the physician placed the stent to hold part of the ruby coil lp within the wall of the sfa.The procedure was completed using three stents, two balloon stents, the same support catheter and the same sheath.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RUBY COIL LP
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key11380605
MDR Text Key233729808
Report Number3005168196-2021-00349
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00815948021778
UDI-Public00815948021778
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K192955
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/01/2005,01/26/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/25/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberRBYLP0304
Device Catalogue NumberRBYLP0304
Device Lot NumberF99453
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Date Manufacturer Received01/26/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/11/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age80 YR
-
-