• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. SIMON NITINOL FILTER SYSTEM; VENA CAVA FILTER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. SIMON NITINOL FILTER SYSTEM; VENA CAVA FILTER Back to Search Results
Model Number 2120F
Device Problems Malposition of Device (2616); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problem Abdominal Pain (1685)
Event Date 08/01/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed with special attention to the raw materials, subassemblies, manufacturing process, and quality control testing.This lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Medical records were provided and reviewed.Approximately seven years and two months post filter deployment, patient presented with abdominal pain.Approximately five years later, computed tomography revealed inferior vena cava filter below the renal veins.The lines tent the inferior vena cava, there was apparent extent of the inferior vena cava tines beyond the margin of the inferior vena cava wall.There was no erosion into the aorta, no erosion of the tines into the bowel.On the coronal view, the tilt was measured at seven degrees with respect of the center of the inferior vena cava filter axis, the tip was toward the right.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for perforation of the inferior vena cava (ivc).However, the investigation is unconfirmed for filter tilt as the medical record states ¿on the coronal view, the tilt was measured at seven degrees with respect of the center of the inferior vena cava filter axis, the tip was toward the right¿.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.Expiry date: 01/2013.
 
Event Description
It was reported through the litigation process that a vena cava filter was placed in a patient after being diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism.At some time post filter deployment, it was alleged that the filter tilted and struts perforated the vena cava wall and mesentery.The device has not been removed and there were no reported attempts made to retrieve the filter.The current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SIMON NITINOL FILTER SYSTEM
Type of Device
VENA CAVA FILTER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
1625 w 3rd st.
tempe AZ 85281
Manufacturer (Section G)
C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO)
289 bay road
queensbury NY 12804
Manufacturer Contact
judith ludwig
1415 w. 3rd street
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key11384878
MDR Text Key234820260
Report Number2020394-2021-80209
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
UDI-Device Identifier00801741040900
UDI-Public(01)00801741040900
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K970099
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,health professional
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/26/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/26/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number2120F
Device Catalogue Number2120F
Device Lot NumberGFTL3377
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/02/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/28/2010
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age75 YR
Patient Weight83
-
-