| Model Number |
1511-01-203 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583); Difficult to Advance (2920)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
02/15/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint #: (b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient had a right total knee that was infected.The infection is gone, so the temporary parts were removed and definitive components were implanted.During impaction of the final femoral construct, the implant would not seat fully.It was a full centimeter proud.The surgeon removed the femur and all the cement on its backside.The trial construct sat perfectly with no issues.The assembly and sizes of all pieces were checked again and were correct.The surgeon then rebroached and reamed over and over again.He used the real implant as the test and would impact it back in.He would go back to broaching and reaming, and seating the real implant.The implant would slowly seat further after more back and forth of broaching and reaming.The surgeon was over reaming the canal by 1mm.The 35mm broach was seated 1cm deeper than it was supposed to be seated.At this point the real implant seated fully.Cement was remixed and the real implant was inserted.On post-op films the construct looks tight with no evidence that the broach had to be seated a full centimeter deeper than it was supposed to be.The rebroaching and rereaming made it possible for the implant to seat fully.This system tends to sit proud, with the real implants a few millimeters, which is very difficult to achieve a balanced knee.This was the worse we have seen with it sitting a full centimeter proud.The pressfit is too much for this system.Surgery was delayed 30mins.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Additional information was received on 02/23/2021 stating that this was a consistent problem.It occurs about 4 out of 5 cases.If it doesn't occur, the femur or tibia cracks, which then allows the construct to seat.This has been documented every time and should not be a surprise to anyone.Additional information was received on 03/01/2021 stating that the sigma components were the temporary spacer parts.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # : pc-(b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary: the device associated with this report was not received for examination.Depuy synthes considers the investigation closed at this time.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed and the investigation may be re-opened as necessary.Device history lot : the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).Where the product and lot code was provided, a manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|