Catalog Number IGTCFS-65-8.5-1-FEM-CELECT |
Device Problems
Structural Problem (2506); Device Tipped Over (2589); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
Patient Problems
Perforation of Vessels (2135); No Information (3190)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Information provided by (b)(6).Occupation: non-healthcare professional.Investigation: filter tilt has been reported.Potential causes may include filter placement in ivcs with diameters larger than those specified in these instructions for use; improper deployment; manipulations near an implanted filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter); and (or) a failed retrieval attempt.Excessive filter tilt may contribute to difficult or failed retrieval; vena cava wall penetration/perforation; and (or) result in loss of filter efficiency.Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: unacceptable filter tilt.This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional information become available.
|
|
Event Description
|
It is alleged that the patient received a cook celect filter and is alleging tilt.Hospital and medical records have not been provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
Event Description
|
No additional information has been provided at this time.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation: the reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.The following allegations have been investigated: fracture , vena cava perforation and tilt.Filter fracture has been reported and may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Fracture of a filter leg may be due to repetitive motion on a filter leg in an unusual, stressed position, such as a filter leg penetrating/perforating the ivc; or a filter leg being caught in a side branch (e.G., a renal vein).Other potential causes of filter fracture may include excessive force or manipulations near an implanted filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Retrieval of a fractured filter or filter fragments (including embolized fragments) using endovascular techniques has been reported.Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: filter fracture, filter or filter fragment embolization, trauma to adjacent structures.Filter interacts with ivc wall, e.G.Penetration/perforation/embedment.This may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Potential causes may include improper deployment; and (or) excessive force or manipulations near an in-situ filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: trauma to adjacent structures, vascular trauma, vena cava perforation, vena cava penetration.Filter tilt has been reported.Potential causes may include filter placement in ivcs with diameters larger than those specified in these instructions for use; improper deployment; manipulations near an implanted filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter); and (or) a failed retrieval attempt.Excessive filter tilt may contribute to difficult or failed retrieval; vena cava wall penetration/perforation; and (or) result in loss of filter efficiency.Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: unacceptable filter tilt.(b)(4) devices in lot.To date, no other complaints have been reported against the lot.The associated work order was reviewed.No related/relevant notes were documented.The device is manufactured and inspected according to specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56 this report includes information known at this time.A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information becomes available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, or that any cook device caused or contributed to or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
Event Description
|
The following information is alleged: the patient received a celect tulip inferior vena cava (ivc) filter on (b)(6 2015.Approximately 3 years and 8 months after receiving the filter implant, the patient underwent a computerized tomography (ct) scan of the abdomen and was informed that the cook filter struts had perforated through their ivc wall and fractured into an unknown location.Hospital and medical records have been requested, but not yet provided.
|
|
Event Description
|
Patient allegedly received an implant on (b)(6) 2015 due to post deep vein thrombosis (dvt).The patient alleges limited activity.On (b)(6) 2019, per a report from computed tomography; ¿an ivc filter is in place.The proximal aspect is at the level of the renal veins.Some of the distal filter limbs appear external to the lumen of the ivc.Metallic densities in the mid abdomen, nonspecific.These may represent surgical clips.¿.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation: the following allegations have been investigated: limited activity.Investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.The reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.Unknown if the reported limited activity is directly related to the filter and unable to identify a corresponding failure mode at this point in time.(b)(4) devices in lot.No relevant notes on work order.The product is manufactured and inspected according to specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information becomes available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, or that any cook device caused or contributed to or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation: investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.Per quality engineering review, the additional information provided for this complaint does not change the previous investigation conclusion.Therefore, no new investigation activities will be conducted at this time.Cook will reopen the investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.(b)(4) devices in lot.No other complaints have been reported against the lot.The associated work order was reviewed.No related/relevant notes were documented.The device is manufactured and inspected according to specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications, and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
Event Description
|
Per a report from computed tomography: "the filter is tilted to the right with its proximal cone against the ivc wall.Coronal image 41.The anterior right strut penetrates 14 mm through the ivc wall.Sagittal image 19.The anterior left strut penetrates 13 mm through the ivc wall.Coronal image 46.The posterior right strut penetrates 8 mm through the ivc wall.Coronal image 40.The posterior left strut penetrates 5 mm through the ivc wall.Coronal image 41.A right arm strut penetrates 13 mm through the ivc wall.Coronal image 43.A left arm strut penetrates 10 mm through the ivc wall.Coronal image 39".
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|