• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CORDIS CORPORATION UNKNOWN OPTEASE VENA CAVA FILTER; FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CORDIS CORPORATION UNKNOWN OPTEASE VENA CAVA FILTER; FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 466FXXXX
Device Problem Unintended Movement (3026)
Patient Problems Internal Organ Perforation (1987); Perforation of Vessels (2135); Stenosis (2263)
Event Date 04/28/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that a patient underwent placement of an optease vena cava filter.The information provided indicated that the filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused organ perforation, filter tilting and stenosis.The indication for the filter implant, procedural details and medical history of the patient have not been provided and there is currently no additional information available for review.The product was not returned for analysis and the sterile lot number has not been provided; therefore, no device analysis nor device history record review could be performed.The optease vena cava filter is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via percutaneous placement in the vena cava for patients in which anticoagulants are contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease has failed, emergency treatment following massive pe where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced or for chronic, recurrent pe where anticoagulant therapy has failed, or is contraindicated.The purpose of a vena cava filter is to catch thrombus from the lower extremities as it travels along normal blood flow patterns up towards the heart.Ivc filter tilt has been associated with operator technique and vessel anatomy, specifically asymmetry and tortuosity.Vessel perforation is a known adverse event associated with implanting vena cava filters and is listed as such in the instructions for use (ifu).The ifu also notes vessel damage such as intimal tears and perforation as procedural and long-term complications related to ivc filters.Depending on the depth of the perforation of the ivc, abutting organs may be impacted.The timing and mechanism of the tilt and perforation has not been reported at this time and a clinical conclusion could not be determined as to the cause of the event.Stenosis is an abnormal narrowing in a blood vessel and does not represent a device malfunction.Without images available for review the reported events could not be confirmed or further clarified.Given the limited information available for review at this time, there is nothing to suggest that the reported events are related to the design and manufacturing process of the device; therefore, no corrective action will be taken.Should additional information become available, the file will be updated accordingly.
 
Event Description
As reported in the legal brief, a patient underwent placement of an optease vena cava filter.The filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused injury and damage to the patient, including, but not limited to organ perforation, filter tilting and stenosis.As a direct and proximate result, the patient suffered life-threatening injuries and damages and required extensive medical care and treatment.As a further proximate result, the patient has suffered and will suffer significant medical expenses, pain and suffering and other damages.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that a patient underwent placement of an optease vena cava filter.The information provided indicated that the filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused organ perforation, filter tilting and stenosis.The patient reported becoming aware of perforation of filter struts outside the ivc, perforation of struts into organs, tilting and stenosis, approximately twelve years and four months post implant.According to the implant record the reason for the exam was ¿need for vena cava filter placement¿.The filter was placed via the right common femoral vein and deployed after performing a venacavogram and locating the renal veins at the level of l1.No intraluminal thrombi were revealed during the cavogram.The medical indication for the filter implant and medical history of the patient have not been provided and there is currently no additional information available for review.The product was not returned for analysis and the sterile lot number has not been provided; therefore, no device analysis nor device history record review could be performed.The optease vena cava filter is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via percutaneous placement in the vena cava for patients in which anticoagulants are contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease has failed, emergency treatment following massive pe where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced or for chronic, recurrent pe where anticoagulant therapy has failed, or is contraindicated.The purpose of a vena cava filter is to catch thrombus from the lower extremities as it travels along normal blood flow patterns up towards the heart.Ivc filter tilt has been associated with operator technique and vessel anatomy, specifically asymmetry and tortuosity.Vessel perforation is a known adverse event associated with implanting vena cava filters and is listed as such in the instructions for use (ifu).The ifu also notes vessel damage such as intimal tears and perforation as procedural and long-term complications related to ivc filters.Depending on the depth of the perforation of the ivc, abutting organs may be impacted.The timing and mechanism of the tilt and perforation has not been reported at this time and a clinical conclusion could not be determined as to the cause of the event.Stenosis is an abnormal narrowing in a blood vessel and does not represent a device malfunction.Without images available for review the reported events could not be confirmed or further clarified.Given the limited information available for review at this time, there is nothing to suggest that the reported events are related to the design and manufacturing process of the device; therefore, no corrective action will be taken.Should additional information become available, the file will be updated accordingly.Sections a1 and a3.
 
Event Description
As reported in the legal brief, a patient underwent placement of an optease vena cava filter.The filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused injury and damage to the patient, including, but not limited to organ perforation, filter tilting and stenosis.As a direct and proximate result, the patient suffered life-threatening injuries and damages and required extensive medical care and treatment.As a further proximate result, the patient has suffered and will suffer significant medical expenses, pain and suffering and other damages.Per the implant records, the right groin was prepared in the usual fashion and under sonographic guidance, the right common femoral vein was punctured.The inferior vena cava (ivc) filter was placed via a right groin approach.An inferior venacavogram was performed revealing no intraluminal thrombi and the location of the renal veins at the level of l1.Subsequently, an optease filter was placed.According to the information received in the patient profile form (ppf), the patient reports perforation of filter struts outside the ivc, perforation of struts into organs, tilting and stenosis becoming aware of these events approximately twelve years and four months after the filter implantation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN OPTEASE VENA CAVA FILTER
Type of Device
FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CORDIS CORPORATION
14201 nw 60th avenue
miami lakes FL 33014 2802
MDR Report Key11393237
MDR Text Key234038986
Report Number1016427-2021-04784
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K034050
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/02/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/01/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number466FXXXX
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/18/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
UNK GUIDEWIRE; UNK WIRE, UNK DILATOR
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening;
Patient Age36 YR
-
-