|
Visual inspection confirms the blade on the anchor is fractured as reported.X-ray image was provided and show that two aero c cages are implanted.The top cage at c5 has its superior anchor fractured and migrating out of the cage.Revision surgery was performed to remove the superior anchor.Material analysis was performed on a similar device with the same failure mode and concluded: 'the aero c cage anchor was found to have fractured in fatigue.All submitted materials were found to be in compliance with the required elemental composition.No material or manufacturing defects were found.Device and complaint history records were reviewed for this lot, and no relevant manufacturing issues or similar complaints were identified.Per the aero c surgical technique: while the expected life of spinal implant components is difficult to estimate, it is finite.These components are made of foreign materials which are placed within the body for the potential fusion of the spine and reduction of pain.Potential risks identified with the use of this intervertebral body fusion device, which may require additional surgery, include: device component fracture (¿).In the event that healing is delayed, does not occur, or failure to immobilize the delayed/nonunion results, the implant will be subject to excessive and repeated stresses which can eventually cause loosening, bending or fatigue fracture.The degree or success of union, loads produced by weight bearing, and activity levels will, among other conditions, dictate the longevity of the implant.It was reported that the patient fused therefore implant performed as intended.The cause of fracture cannot be determined conclusively however factors like patient loading over time, fatigue, life style, activity level, smoker may have contributed to the reported fracture.
|