|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unchanged, unknown, or unavailable.Investigation ¿ evaluation.The complaint facility riverside hospital informed cook of an incident involving a flexor ansel guiding sheath (kcfw-7.0-18/38-45-rb-anl1-hc) from lot 13622410.The device valve reportedly leaked during an abdomen run off on (b)(6) 2021.The user noticed the valve leaked and was pulsating blood out of the valve during the procedure but they successfully completed the procedure with this device.The patient reportedly experienced no adverse effects as a result of this incident.Reviews of the complaint history, device history record, drawing, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, and quality control procedures of the device, as well as a visual inspection and function test, were conducted during the investigation.The complainant returned one used kcfw-7.0-18/38-45-rb-anl1-hc to cook for investigation.The device was leak tested to find leakage occurred through the valve.The silicone disc was examined, and a tear was found.Additionally, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.Sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The device is shipped with instruction for use (ifu) which provides the following information to the user related to the reported failure mode: "precautions all interventional or diagnostic instruments used with this product should move freely through the valve and sheath to avoid damage.How supplied upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred." a review of the device history record (dhr) was also conducted as a part of the investigation to check for failure related nonconformances and additional complaints.The dhr for the complaint lot found no nonconformances.Related subassembly lot records 1 non-conformance on 18 devices for failed leak test which were all scrapped.A complaint history search found no additional complaints on lot 13622410 from the field.As adequate inspection activities have been established, there is objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no other lot related complaints have been received from the field, it was concluded that there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in the field and that the complaint lot was manufactured to current specifications.Based on the information provided, the examination of returned product, and the results of the investigation, the cause was traced to a component failure.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Per the quality engineering risk assessment no further action is required.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|