|
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 M.R.I. HARD BASE IMPLANTABLE PORT, GROSHONG SINGLE-LUMEN, 8F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
0604520 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Fracture (1260); Failure to Infuse (2340); Migration (4003)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
|
| Date of Event |
12/11/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
As the lot number for the device was provided, a manufacturing review will be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.(expiry date: 05/2024).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that post port device implant in the right subclavian vein, the device allegedly stopped working and was replaced with another device.It was further reported that the front part of the flow system was found to be missing.The current status of the patient is unknown.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that post port device implant in the right subclavian vein, the device allegedly stopped working and was replaced with another device.It was further reported that the front part of the flow system was found to be missing and was found to be migrated under ct scan.Additional intervention was under gone to recover the device.The current status of the patient is unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: a lot history review was performed.This is the first complaint reported to date for this product and lot, therefore a device history record review is not required.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.The investigation is inconclusive for the reported migration issue.A definitive root cause could not be determined.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4 (expiry date: 05/2024).H11: section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text: device not returned.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|