C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT DUO M.R.I. IMPLANTABLE PORT, CHRONOFLEX DUAL-LUMEN, 9.5F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 5829502 |
Device Problems
Complete Blockage (1094); Fracture (1260); Material Protrusion/Extrusion (2979)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 02/11/2021 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
As the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.The device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that post port device implant, the septum of the device was allegedly dislodge and ruptured.The device was removed.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.(expiry date: 05/2022) section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that post port device implant, the septum of the device was allegedly dislodges and ruptured.The device was removed.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: manufacturing review: a complaint history review was performed.This is the forth complaint reported for this product/lot number combination.A device history record review was conducted and there was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: one powerport duo mri implantable port attached to a catheter were returned for evaluation.Visual, microscopic visual, tactile and functional evaluation were performed on the returned device.The investigation is confirmed for the reported port septum dislodged issue as the right port septum was noted to have partially dislodged from the port base.The investigation is also confirmed for the identified complete blockage issue as resistance was noted upon infusing and aspirating through the right port septum and blockage was noted upon inserting scientific guidewire and pin gauge on the right septum.However, the investigation is unconfirmed for the reported port septum rupture as no fracture or rupture was identified on the port septum.A definitive root cause could not be determined.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4 (expiry date: 05/2022).H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : see h10.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that post port device implant, the septum of the device was allegedly dislodge and ruptured.The device was removed.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|