|
It was reported that, after a thr that had been performed on 2019, the patient experienced a dislocation while squatting down and leaning to his far right to reach for power socket.Then, continued to experience subsequent dislocations.Patient underwent revision surgery to remove 20 deg xlpe acet lnr ((b)(4)) and oxinium fem hd ((b)(4)) and replace with constrained liner and new femoral head.
|
|
The device, used in treatment, was not returned for evaluation and the reported event could not be confirmed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, this case reports that a revision surgery was performed due to recurrent dislocations.Per email communication, there is no consent granted to provide x-rays or surgical reports, and no further information has been provided.Therefore, the patient impact beyond the revision cannot be determined.No further clinical assessment can be rendered at this time.Should clinically relevant documentation become available, the clinical/medical task may be re-evaluated.A complaint history review found related failures for the listed device; this failure mode will be monitored for future complaints for any necessary corrective actions.A review of the risk management file and instructions for use documents revealed this failure mode was previously identified.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Possible causes could include but not limited to traumatic injury, patient anatomy or abnormal loading of limb.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Without the return of the actual product involved, our investigation could not proceed.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|