| Model Number |
AT75184 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Deflation Problem (1149); Difficult to Remove (1528)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
02/21/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported as unknown.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.The medical records included images.The image review was documented in the medical records.Medical records were provided and reviewed.Approximately ten years and four months later, a computed tomography (ct) abdomen and pelvis without contrast was performed and it revealed there was a caval perforation of 9 o'clock was 10.0mm, strut was bent posteriorly and superiorly and 6 o'clock was 9.2mm.Right sided tilt with 7.04-degrees.There was migration and the apex of the filter was at the level of the renal veins.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for alleged filter migration, material deformation and perforation of the inferior vena cava.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: the review of the ifu (instructions for use), indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, and contraindications showed that the product labeling is adequate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure, the balloon unable to deflate and cannot be removed from the sheath.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure, the balloon unable to deflate and cannot be removed from the sheath.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failure as no objective evidence was provided for review.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: the review of the instructions for use, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, and contraindications showed that the product labeling is adequate.H10: d4 (expiry date: 04/2023).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|