| Model Number |
BA823SU |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Difficult to Open or Remove Packaging Material (2922)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturing site evaluation: investigation on-going.Should relevant additional information / investigation results become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported to aesculap ag that a carbon steel safety scalpel #23 (part # ba823su) failed during use.According to the complainant, the io blade-failure during use.Reportedly, the primary packaging of the scalpel tore, causing a loss of sterilization.There was no described patient harm.Additional information has not been made available.The malfunction is filed under aag reference (b)(4).Associated medwatch-reports: 9610612-2021-00184 ((b)(4) + ba823su), 9610612-2021-00197 ((b)(4) + ba823su), and 9610612-2021-00183 ((b)(4) + ba823su).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Associated medwatch-reports: 9610612-2021-00197 ((b)(4) + ba823su), 9610612-2021-00183 ((b)(4) + ba823su), and 9610612-2021-00184 ((b)(4) + ba823su).Investigation results/ leading device: reference code: (b)(4).Device name: carbon steel safety scalpel #23.Serial number: n/a.Batch number: 4512049352.Manufacturing date: 16.10.2020.Reference code: (b)(4).Device name: carbon steel safety scalpel #23.Serial number: n/a.Batch number: 4512049354.Manufacturing date: 16.10.2020.Products are available for investigation.Failure description: the samples arrived in different conditions, some showed the defect described by the customer, others were intact and have not been opened yet.Vigilance investigator carried out the pictorial documentation visually and microscopically.The samples are showing a rested part of the pe foil on the sealing area and the other part torn and loosened from the sealing area.As there is no hint for a material issue on the foil itself and due to tests performed during an earlier complaint (b)(4) which showed no deviation regarding the sealing, we therefore assume that there is no manufacturing issue.Some samples have been opened to reproduce the defect, and it could be confirmed, that by using lateral or fitful force during the opening the foil gets damaged.But by linear opening it remained intact.Batch history review: the device quality and manufacturing history records have been checked for the available lot number and were found to be according to our specifications valid at the time of production.No similar complaints against the same lot number(s) 4512049352.One similar complaint against the same lot number 4512049354 for the same customer.Explanation and rationale: based on our investigation of the affected sample and the fact that in 5 years only two complaints from two different customers have been reported regarding this issue, we assume that there is no product deviation.Conclusion and root cause: due to the current deviation and according to the explanation and rationale, the root cause of the problem is most probably usage-related.There is actually no hint regarding a manufacturing issue as the sealing boarders are existent and the sealing process is validated.A peel force measurement showed no deviation from the expectable force.Additionally, there are only complaints from two different customers regarding this issue in the last 5 years.Based upon the investigations results a capa is not necessary.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|