|
|
| Catalog Number |
5954790 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Material Deformation (2976); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001); Migration (4003)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Abdominal Pain (1685); Pain (1994); Seroma (2069); Hernia (2240); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
10/11/2012
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard/davol ventralight st mesh (device #2).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol mesh ¿ ventralex (device #1).Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for the implant of unspecified bard/davol ventralex on (b)(6) 2006 and ventralight st on (b)(6) 2011.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for the implant of unspecified bard/davol ventralex on (b)(6) 2006 and ventralight st on (b)(6) 2011.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2006 - patient was diagnosed with incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of ventralex mesh (device #1).Per op notes, ¿the hernia sac was identified and dissected.The hernia sac was reduced.A ventralex mesh (device #1) was placed using prolene sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2011 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of ventralight st (device #2).Per op notes, ¿multiple upper midline incisional hernia sacs were identified, opened and reduced.Two smaller defects were identified and reduced.The omentum and bowel were freed.A ventralight st (device #2) was placed using prolene sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2012 - patient was diagnosed with incarcerated recurrent incisional hernia with abdominal pain thereby underwent open repair with implant of bard flat mesh (device #3).Per op notes, ¿the seroma cavity was identified and drained.The prior mesh (device #1 and #2) was pulled away from the abdominal wall, rolled up on the right side and not incorporated.The rolled up meshes were sutured back to the defect using prolene sutures.The hernia sac was identified with incarcerated small bowel were reduced.A bard flat mesh (device #3) was placed and sutured with prior mesh using prolene sutures.¿.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-jun-2011) is considered to be a best estimate.This supplemental emdr represents the bard/davol ventralight st mesh (device #2).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol mesh ¿ ventralex (device #1).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|